Jafra D. Thomas1, Samantha M. Ross2, Jenner R. Sapienza1
1California Polytechnic State University, College of Science and Mathematics, Department of Kinesiology and Public Health, San Luis Obispo, USA
2West Virginia University, College of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Morgantown, USA
Recommendations for Effective Coaching Practices: A Case Study using the Multidimensional Model of Leadership as a Guiding Framework
J. Anthr. Sport Phys. Educ. 2022, 6(2), 27-31 | DOI: 10.26773/jaspe.220405
Abstract
Universities, sport governing bodies, and industry associations have employed coach development programs to remedy gaps that coaches experience in their job preparation. The purpose of this article is to report on a single-participant case study that investigated the applicability of one popular theory used in coach development programs: the multidimensional model of leadership (MDML). A key tenet of MDML is that athletes will experience positive gains in their performance and performance satisfaction when coached in their preferred way. Research testing the MDML has produced a nearly universal list of athlete-preferred coaching behaviors (e.g., democratic coaching styles are highly valued). The present case study explored the extent such a list held true for one collegiate athlete during her playing days. A structured telephone interview was used. The participant’s responses were analyzed using discourse analysis. The results of the discourse analysis were synthesized with findings from the research literature used to compose the interview questions (i.e., a critical interpretive synthesis). Findings from the present study indicated there was general agreement between the research-generated list of athlete preferences and the participant’s own preferences as a collegiate athlete. Yet, findings of the investigation also revealed nuances in how situations (e.g., injuries, athlete empathy towards coaches) may influence/explain an athlete’s choice in coaching preference. Namely what is preferred, and preference order, is not static. This study provides coaches with a tangible example of how theory connects to athlete experiences. Key findings are discussed as an educational tool for coaching preparation, including their application to future coach development programs.
Keywords
Athlete Training, Coach Development Program, Kinesiology, Leadership, Theory to Practice
View full article
(PDF – 99KB)
References
Ahmed, D.M., & Cardinal, B.J. (2020). Can a digital workbook informed by pedagogical principles improve coaching behavior? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 91 (6), 55-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2020.1770540
Barcza-Renner, K., Eklund, R.C., Morin, A.J., & Habeeb, C.M. (2016). Controlling coaching behaviors and athlete burnout: Investigating the mediating roles of perfectionism and motivation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 38 (1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2015-0059
Beith, P. (2020). Core mission. National Sports Performance Association. Retrieved from: http://nspa.org/about-nspa/core-mission/
Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26 (13), 1802-1811. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1049732316654870
Da Silva, E.J., Evans, M.B., Lefebvre, J.S., Allan, V., Côté, J., & Palmeira, A. (2020). A systematic review of intrapersonal coach development programs: Examining the development and evaluation of programs to elicit coach reflection. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 15 (5-6), 818-837. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1747954120943508
De Muynck, G-J., Vansteenkiste, M., Delrue, J., Aelterman, N., Haerens, L., & Soenens, B. (2017). The effects of feedback valence and style on need satisfaction, self-talk, and perseverance among tennis players: An experimental study. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 39 (1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2015-0326
Elliot, R., & Timulak. (2021). Why a generic approach to descriptive-interpretive qualitative research? In Essentials of descriptive-interpretive qualitative research: A generic approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hodge, S., Ammah, J.O.A., Casebolt, K.M., LaMaster, K., Hersman, B., Samalot-Rivera, A., & Sato, T. (2009). A diversity of voices: Physical education teachers’ beliefs about inclusion and teaching students with disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 56(4), 401-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349120903306756
Horn, T.S., Bloom, P., Berglund, K.M., & Packard, S. (2011). Relationship between collegiate athletes’ psychological characteristics and their preferences for different types of coaching behavior. The Sport Psychologist, 25(2), 190–211.
Lee, Y., & Yoon, I. (2020). Exploring race consciousness among South Korean college students through sport. Quest, 72(3), 338-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2020.1749860
Massey, W.V., & Whitley, M.A. (2021). The talent paradox: Disenchantment, disengagement, and damage through sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 38(2), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2019-0159
Moen, F., Høigaard, R., & Peters, D.M. (2014). Performance progress and leadership behavior. International Journal of Coaching Science, 8(1), 69–79.
Oldridge, L., Nelson, L., Greenough, K., & Potrac, P. (2016). The interplay between learning, knowledge, biography and practice: The tale of an experienced track & field athletics coach. International Sport Coaching Journal, 3(3), 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2016-0020
Oregon State University. (n.d.). Category 2: Anonymous or non-sensitive research using educational tests, surveys, questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, or observations of public behavior. Office of Research Integrity. Oregon State University. Retrieved on July 26, 2021, from https://research.oregonstate.edu/irb/exempt-review-0
Smith, B., & McGannon, K.R. (2018) Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 101-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357
Surujlal, J., & Dhurup, M. (2012). Athlete preference of coach’s leadership style. African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation & Dance, 18(1), 111–121.
Szarabajko, A., Cardinal, B.J., Dailey, D.B., Ughelu, N.E., & Wambaugh, J. D. (2021). Field audit of strength and conditioning coaches’ instructional and motivational language repertoire. Journal of Anthropology of Sport and Physical Education, 5(3), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.26773/jaspe.210701
Szedlak, C., Smith, M.J., Callary, B., & Day, M.C. (2020). Examining how elite S&C coaches develop coaching practice using reflection stimulated by video vignettes. International Sport Coaching Journal, 7(3), 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2019-0059
Thomas, J.D., Uwadiale, A.Y., & Watson, N.M. (2021). Towards equitable communication of kinesiology: A critical interpretive synthesis of readability research: 2021 National Association for Kinesiology in Higher Education Hally Beth Poindexter Young Scholar Address. Quest, 73(2), 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2021.1897861
Vernau, J.W., Bishop, C., Chavda, S., Weldon, A., Maloney, S.J., Pacey, R., & Turner, A.N. (2021). An analysis of the minimal qualifications, experience and skill sets required for S&C employment. Professional Strength & Conditioning, 60, 7-17.
Weinberg, R.S., & Gould, D. (2015). Leadership. In Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.