1Trinity Academy New Bridge, Department of Physical Education, Sunderland, UK
Employing the teaching games for understanding model to improve social responsibility in a Physical Education class with children who have special needs: A qualitative study approach
J. Anthr. Sport Phys. Educ. 2022, 6(4), 27-29 | DOI: 10.26773/jaspe.221005
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to explore whether children with special needs taking part in physical education (PE) could improve their levels of social responsibility using the Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) model over a fourteen‐lesson period. The study used a qualitative semi-structured interviews approach in which the design consisted of an assessment after lesson 7 and then again after lesson 14. A TGfU dodgeball intervention was carried out during the study and the participants (n = 14) were in their second and third years of secondary education within a special needs school specifically established for children who have social, emotional, and mental health concerns (SEMH). According to the background and ability levels of the students the teacher- researcher decided to implement the full use of the original TGfU model using its features to act as a strategy for intervention. The teacher-researcher was an experienced teacher of PE who undertook a dual role throughout the study including assessing the data and undertaking the semi-structured interviews. Qualitatively, data was open and coded line‐by‐line and incident‐to‐incident, categorised into themes and then analysed further into sub‐ themes. The qualitative information supported that the pedagogical strategies within the original TGfU model could have a clear impact on the levels of democracy, empowerment and reflections of children with special educational needs. In conclusion, the TGfU model should be considered as an approach and positive intervention to improve the social responsibility levels of children with special needs.
Keywords
Teaching games, Special needs, Children, Physical education
View full article
(PDF – 87KB)
References
Bell, L. (2016). “Theoretical Foundations for Social Justice Education.” In Teaching for Diversity and Social Justice, edited by M. Adams, L. A. Bell, D. J. Goodman, and K. Y. Joshi, 3–26. Abingdon: Routledge.
Bracco, E.; Lodewyk, K.R.; Morrison, H. (2019). A case study of disengaged adolescent girls’ experiences with teaching games for understanding in physical education. Curric. Stud. Heal. Phys. Educ. 10, 207–225.
Bunker, D. and Thorpe, R. (1983) ‘A Model for the Teaching of Games in Secondary Schools’, Bulletin of Physical Education 19: 5–8.
Butler, J. (2013). Situating ethics in games education. Canadian Journal of Education: 36 (4).
Butler, J. (2017). Feminist directions for Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) Movement. Volume 1 87-88.
Goodlad, J. (2004). Education for everyone. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hellison, D. (2003). Teaching responsibility through physical activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Harvey S., Cushion C. J., Wegis H. M. Massa-Gonzales A. N. (2010). Teaching games for understanding in American high-school soccer: A quantitative data analysis using the Game Performance Assessment Instrument. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 15:29–54.
Jarrett, K.; Light, R. (2018). The experience of teaching using a game based approach: Teachers as learners, collaborators and catalysts. Eur. Phys. Educ. Rev. 25, 565–580.
Kirk, D. (2013). What is the future for physical education in the twenty-first century? In S. Capel & M. Whitehead (Eds.), Debates in physical education teaching (pp. 220–231). New York, NY: Routledge.
Koekoek, J.; Knoppers, A. (2013). The role of perceptions of friendships and peers in learning skills in physical education. Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagogy. 20, 231–249.
Morales-Belando, M., Kirk, D., Arias-Estero, J. (2020). A Systematic Review of Teaching Games for Understanding Intervention Studies from A Practice-Referenced Perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise ad Sport. Oct 20;1-12.
Light, R. (2002). The Social Nature of Games: Australian Preservice Primary Teachers First Experiences of Teaching Games for Understanding. European Physical Education Review. 8(3):286-304.
Mandigo, J; & Corlett, J. (2010). Teaching games for understanding of what? TGfU’s role in the development of physical literacy. More teaching games for understanding. Moving globally. In: Butler J. I., Griffin L. L., editors. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. pp. 69–78.
Memmert, D. Almond, L. Bunker, D. Butler, J. Fasold, F. Griffin, L. Hillmann, W. Hüttermann, S. Klein-Soetebier, T. König, S. Nopp, S. Rathschlag, M. Schul, K. Schwab, S. Thorpe, R. & Furley, P. (2015). Top 10 Research Questions Related to Teaching Games for Understanding, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 86:4, 347-359.
Varealla, F. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.