Cherese Farrah Jones Couto¹, Leepile Cyril Motlhaolwa¹, Louis Jacobus van Zyl¹, , ,

¹The University of Pretoria, Department of Humanities Education, Pretoria, South Africa
²

Emergency remote learning - the experiences of higher education Physical Education students

J. Anthr. Sport Phys. Educ. 2023, 7(1), 7-11 | DOI: 10.26773/jaspe.230102

Abstract

The impact of Covid-19 caused significant disruptions to student learning, where online delivery and assessment represent a critical consideration for physical education teacher education (PETE). The Covid-19 pandemic posed a problem with sectoral disruption in higher education, sport, and physical activity. Students specialising in Physical Education (PE) had to experience a temporary shift of instructional delivery in the practical modules to an alternative delivery mode. The improvisation and rapid conversion of delivering learning activities were purely experimental to facilitate student learning. There is a general apprehension about online learning for students in PETE, most notably, the absence of face-to-face education through movement that is difficult to replicate digitally. Emergency remote learning engendered questions and challenges regarding pedagogical approaches. Lecturers explored the effectiveness of emergency remote learning through student experiences. Descriptive research was conducted, following a mixed-method approach to understand students’ experiences, perceptions, and challenges. 140 students specialising in PE completed an online questionnaire. The quantitative data were analysed using the statistical package for the social sciences programme, and the qualitative data was thematically analysed. The majority of the students feel they have successfully reached the outcome of each module respectively. The availability of online class recordings assisted students in their self-paced approach to learning. Collaborative learning was preferred only if the lecturer was involved, as it seemed a significant challenge when student-driven. A PE programme needs a face-to-face approach and can benefit from a blended teaching approach. Educators transitioning suddenly to remote operation can consider adopting a similar pedagogical approach.

Keywords

emergency remote learning, higher education, physical education, physical education teacher education, student experiences

View full article
(PDF – 218KB)

References

Branch, R.M., & Dousay, T.A. (2015). Survey of instructional design models. Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic Analysis. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, 57-71.

Bonett, D. G., & Wright, T. A. (2015). Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. Journal of organizational behavior, 36(1), 3-15.

Bouilheres, F., Le, L. T. V. H., McDonald, S., Nkhoma, C., & Jandug-Montera, L. (2020). Defining student learning experience through blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3049-3069.

Burgess, S., & Sievertsen, H. H. (2020). Schools, Skills, and Learning: The Impact of COVID-19 on Education.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Dyment, J. E., & Jillian, J. D. (2020). Online initial teacher education: a systematic review of the literature. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 316-333.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T. & Bond, A. (2020). The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning.

Kumar, R. (2019). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. (5th ed). Sage Publications: London.

Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: what is it? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 491-495.

Molleman, L., Van den Berg, P., & Weissing, F. J. (2014). Consistent individual differences in human social learning strategies. Nature Communications, 5 (1), 1-9.

Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (1966). Teaching physical education. Columbus, OH, Merrill.

Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (1986) Teaching Physical Education. Edition 3. Columbus, OH, Merrill.

Quennerstedt, M. (2019). Physical education and the art of teaching: transformative learning and teaching in physical education and sports pedagogy. Sport, Education, and Society, 611-623.

Richards, S., Aziz, N., Bale, S., Bick, D., Das, S., Gastierford, J., & Rehm, H. L. (2015). Standards and guidelines for interpreting sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genetics in Medicine, 17, 405-423.

Sanchez, B., Byra, M., & Wallhead, T. L. (2012). Students’ perceptions of the command, practice, and inclusion styles of teaching. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 17(3), 317-330.

Singh, A. S. (2017). Common procedures for the development, validity, and reliability of a questionnaire. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 5(5), 790-801.

South African Government. (2020) Statement by President Cyril Ramaphosa on the escalation of measures to combat the Covid-19 epidemic. Union buildings, Tshwane, South Africa. http://www.dirco.gov.za/docs/ speeches/2020/cram0323.pdf

South African Government. (2020). Minister Blade Nzimande: Measures to deal with the Coronavirus COVID-19 in the post-school education and training sector. https://www. gov.za/speeches/minister-highereducation- science-and-innovation-statement-measures-deal-COVID- 19-threat.

Thomas, J. R., Nelson, J. K., & Silverman, S. (2011). Research Methods in Physical Activity (6th ed.). Human Kinetics.

Varea, V., & Gonzales-Calvo, G. (2021). Touchless classes and absent bodies: teaching physical education in times of Covid-19. Sport, Education and Society, 831-845.Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of higher psychological process.